YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Animals WERE harmed in the making of this movie

    Several famous films were denied permission to use the famous disclaimer after mistreating animals onset

    The credits are almost over and a familiar phrase flashes across the screen: “No animals were harmed in the making of this movie”. The words are so familiar they have become part of popular culture.

    The American Humane Association is the only organisation allowed to bestow the disclaimer on a movie after trade-marking the first four words. They’ve been working to ensure animal actors – such as Uggie the dog in ‘The Artist’ or the equine thesps in ‘War Horse’ – have been treated humanely on movie sets since 1940, when a horse was needlessly killed during the filming of ‘Jesse James’.

    They monitor as many films and TV shows as possible – though the trend towards shooting outside the US means more and more big-budget Hollywood films escape their jurisdiction.

    [See more: What happened to famous animal stars?]
    [See more: All the latest Oscar news]

    On-set observers monitor scenes featuring animals and give the film a rating based on how well they are treated. Those judged “Outstanding” now get the famous credit, while the films which are merely “acceptable” are allowed to put “American Humane Association monitored the animal action” .

    Projects are rated “unacceptable” when film makers ignore safety rules and animals get hurt or even killed. The rating has been extremely rare in recent years and can only be found on a handful of films, but some are extremely famous or surprising.

    We looked at the AHA’s database of film reviews to find which films were denied the famous credit and why. They include…

    Snow joke... kids' flickSnow Buddies (2008)
    The film: A straight-to-DVD sequel to Disney’s ‘Air Buddies’, about five mischievous golden receivers. Not a classic.
    What happened? Basically, five puppies died on set. Disney unknowingly used underage and ill dogs during production, and several had to be put down after contracting parvovirus. Dogs used on movie sets must be at least eight-weeks-old, and these weren’t. The breeder who supplied the poor creatures was charged with fraud for falsifying health documents. Not the best PR for a Disney flick.

    Speed Racer (2008)
    The film: Misjudged attempt by Andy and Lana (formerly Larry) ‘The Matrix’ Wachowski to bring animation ‘Speed Racer’ to the big screen.
    What happened? This notorious flop was a shambles behind the camera as well. Firstly, five piranhas died for unknown reasons on set. Then one of two chimps playing comedy relief ape Chim-Chim bit the hand of a young actor standing in for Paulie Litt (Spritle Racer) for no reason. Finally, towards the end of filming, the chimp’s trainer hit him “in an uncontrolled impulse”.

    The Lord of the Flies (1990)
    The film: Duff adaptation of William Golding’s classic book about boys stranded on a desert island.
    What happened? The AHA doesn’t go into much detail here, but apparently puffer fish were killed while shooting scenes in Jamaica. No laws were broken, but it was still a needless loss of animal life.

    Vampire’s Kiss (1988)
    The film: Mental Nicolas Cage effort; he plays an advertising exec who thinks he’s turning into a vampire. Famous because…
    What happened? …it features a scene where Nic’s character eats a live cockroach. He did this for real, and then did another take. The AHA was not impressed.

    [See more: Embarrassing mistakes on movie posters]
    [See more: Why do stars go nude?]

    One Man’s Hero (1999)
    The film: Forgotten historical drama about Irish gang the St Patrick’s Brigade – who caused trouble in Mexico back in the day. Stars Tom Berenger.
    What happened? The AHA weren’t on set for this, but they reckon (after several anonymous tip-offs) that horses were tripped with wires during production - which is illegal. The producers did not co-operate and - even worse - slapped the ‘No animals were harmed’ disclaimer on the credits without permission. Speaking of which…

    The King’s Speech (2010)
    The film: Oscar-winning yarn about King George VI and his stutter.
    What happened? We're almost certain no critters were actually harmed in this, but the film got into bother for the unauthorised use of their famous credit. The AHA weren’t on-set and threatened legal action. Producers said they didn’t realise the phrase was copyrighted. This is rated ‘not monitored’.

    Troubled production... 'Conan the Barbarian'

    Conan the Barbarian (1982)
    The film: Classic almost mute fantasy flick starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as the buff warrior-king.
    What happened? Serious abuse of horses throughout the film – at one point a nag falls over pointed spikes. It was shot in Spain, which (at the time) had rather lax laws about animal welfare. The AHA were not allowed onset but organised a protest outside cinemas on its release. Sequel ‘Conan the Destroyer’ was also deemed unacceptable for camel abuse.

    First Blood (1982)

    The film: First and by-far the best ‘Rambo’ film that starred Sylvester Stallone as a mentally damaged Vietnam war vet.
    What happened? An animal care official on set saw rats burnt by an actor, thrown against a wall and “squeezed” by production staff. Apparently the director and crew were laughing at the abuse. Not nice.

    Unacceptable... 'Fast & Furious'
    Fast & Furious (2009)
    The film: Lesser instalment of petrol-head action franchise.
    What happened? There’s a cockfighting scene. It was shot in Mexico – where the blood sport is legal – and the film’s producers wouldn’t pay for the AHA to fly out and oversee the sequence (according to their site anyway). After watching the footage they reckon the birds may have actually been fighting - in violation of their rules - and invited the public to complain to studio Universal.

    Apocalypse Now (1979)
    The film: Trippy Vietnam War epic starring Martin Sheen and Marlon Brando.
    What happened? The finale saw Willard (Sheen) hack Kurtz (Brando) to death while natives sacrificed a water buffalo with machetes. The footage of animal slaughter was obviously real and it got the ‘unacceptable’ rating.

    [See more: 'Woman in Black' review]
    [See more: Worst movie lookalikes]

    Heaven’s Gate (1980)
    The film: Nihilistic western starring Christopher Walken that is infamously Hollywood’s biggest-ever flop.
    What happened? All sorts - and most of it horrible. Without going into too much detail, there were cockfights, chicken decapitations and a horse was “blown up”. One owner sued for the injuries his horse suffered and the case was settled out of court. An upshot was that the nastiness prompted Hollywood unions to contractually authorise the AHA to oversee animal actors, so at least the beasties didn’t suffer in vain. Another reason not to watch a truly awful film.

    Would you now skip these films knowing their production history? Let us know in the comments section below...

     
    • rammstein  •  Mt Prospect, United States  •  1 month 18 days ago
      Well these animal abuses, while real, pale in comparison to the history of the MPAA allowing scenes showing graphic abuse of cats. What we need is the MPAA to realize that they must mention in the ratings if animal harm is a part of the story line of a film. If they wouldn't show a baby being tortured to death, why is it okay to show a defenseless animal experiencing the same thing?
    • dan  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      who was the actor seen burning rats on the rambo film ?
      • sharon 3 months ago
        why? are you going to go round there?
      • Skippy 3 months ago
        yes i wonder who it was. name and shame.
      • stuart 3 months ago
        it was me
    • cannissolis  •  3 months ago
      I suppose I did once wonder what DIStressed leather is as I know it is imperfect leather that is aniline dyed and shows any natural creases and scars etc and has NOTHING to do with skinning alive, and whilst this may happen it would be easier to skin if it wasn't kicking and squealing so I guess you are a joker or a BullS***er. however snakes are skinned alive in the far east as it increases the adrenaline in the meat which is said to make it taste better.
    • doogie  •  Gillingham, England  •  3 months ago
      The scene in Apocalypse Now was a piece of old doccumentry film inserted into the main film. The buffalo was not killed in the making of the film
    • Chris Bedford  •  Maidenhead, England  •  3 months ago
      two words one film , ZOMBIE HOLOCAUST...............................
    • MAX B  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Cannibal Holocaust would never have made the AHA happy then!!
      • sharon 3 months ago
        its alright they're not bothered about humans
    • sharon  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Sadly people disgust me more and more every day.
      • EARTH 3 months ago
        I've felt like that for a long while about the human race.
      • tramp 3 months ago
        Just don't yahoo so much, you'll feel better.
      • 2cats 3 months ago
        I've felt this way, too, for a long time. But, I've realized that I pay more attention to the sad, disgusting stories of people than I do the stories of people being kind and good. It's the media and what they choose to share with the rest of the world. Think about it: There are probably loads of people who feel as we do and are disgusted by the human race. If that's true, then perhaps there are more of us who are kind to one another and to animals than we realize. Just trying to be hopeful since the world is negative enough without my help. :-)
    • JANE  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      I thought the worst film was the notorious Charge of the Light Brigade where horses were felled by using a trip wire, killing and maiming several horses. It's sick what we do for our entertainment.
      • Kevin P 3 months ago
        So what now you are scrapping the barrell how long agao was that made
      • Bob 3 months ago
        Kevin, 1979 is a comparatively long time ago. I don't know how old you are, and I won't try to guess (because I'm bad at guessing ages), but for someone who was born in '84, a film made in '79 is a long time ago.

        And just because a film/ TV show/ book/ news event was made or happened long ago, it doesn't change the fact that there was something disagreeable in it. Look at how people still end up flipping out over 'Lolita' and other books of that type.
      • Casual Commenter 3 months ago
        Looking at Kevins mentality, he wasn't born that long ago. Maybe yesterday...
    • suzanne  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      I'm not very happy about the fact that I bought my young daughter Snow Buddies for Christmas a couple of years ago. I would expect better from Disney.
      • Kimberley 3 months ago
        They were give false health documents, not really their faults i would say. And the dogs contracted parovirus it wasnt any sort of abuse during the film making, that caused them to need to be putdown!
      • Bob 3 months ago
        I agree with Kimberley here; it wasn't Disney's fault, it was the breeder's.
      • english 3 months ago
        i dont agree they should of firstly used a reputable breeder or at least had a vet check em over they can tell if under 8 weeks there is a difference
    • brenda  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      These films aren't about animal torture/cruelty so why do they need to include it they could use fake animals or not show it at all.
    • Ann J  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      How sad that film makers have so little regard for thier animal stars, I would never knowingly watch any film that harmed any creature
    • jackie  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      If they misreat animals knowingly, they should loose their licence to make and sell films.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      Disguisting. Those poor animals were abused for some stupid film? Some died? Is that fair?No, it is not.
    • Dean  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      I always wondered about Conan, although those spikes were supposed to be rubber (so the DVD commentary says) I was unconvinced and definitely in the sequel you can see horses are tripped or made to fall without forwarning which could seriously damage them.
      The Appocolypse now scene was film of a real tribal feast and whilst harrowing (doubly for being real) on reflection, it was not ordered by Hollywood, merely observed and is potentially not much different to what happenes in slaughter houses around the world, just that we don't see it.....
    • elaine  •  Sheffield, England  •  3 months ago
      Disgusting!! When there's money to be made no-one seems to care about anything, especially innocent animals! Animals were not put on this planet for us to use and abuse! Shame on them all! :-(
    • CAL  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Big Toby - I hope for your miserable sake, animals never rule the world - you'd be one of the first to be gotten rid of
    • Lee  •  Telford, England  •  3 months ago
      Should be a simple matter of not using animals in an attempt to make a profit from them no matter the use of the animals. Surly CGI effects these days are good enough to create any animal? They create dragons and gollums and worlds exploding surely a cat or dog is not difficult to do! Anyone who hurts animals for the sake of hurting them should be hung, no questions asked.
    • SUZIE  •  Ilford, England  •  3 months ago
      Flaming disgusting no animal should suffer for peoples entertainment! Makes my blood boil!!!
    • Rairai  •  3 months ago
      Disgusting that so many animals have suffered, and worse for such #$%$ movies I wish AHA had the lawyers to get justice for these poor animals as it still goes on
    • BARRY  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      Poor mistreated animals,films should be boycotted and some very hefty fines to all involved including the 'stars' of these film's.Perhap's a name and shame on the closing credit's?