Recent articles
Alfred Hitchcock left behind a legacy that almost passed as a blueprint for future Hollywood successes – never show the monster too early ('Jaws') - make sure to cameo in your own films (enter stage left Quentin Tarantino). Hitchcock even coined the phrase 'The Maguffin' – a term used to describe a meaningless item that is there purely to drive the plot along ('Indiana Jones' would be lost without it).
However, it seems one piece of sage advice was overlooked. "The length of a film should be directly related to the endurance of the human bladder," he once said.
Films like 'Titanic', 'Lord of the Rings' and 'Australia' are conceived as epics. Yes, you could probably shave an hour off the running time of each if you cut out the sweeping camera shots, but then you deny cinemagoers the reason why they chose to see them. They are expected to endure a bum numbing running time because it’s an occasion, a spectacle, an experience.
Can you really say the same for films based on a comic book, theme park ride or 80s childhood toys?
'Spider-Man 3', 'The Pirates of the Caribbean' trilogy and most recently 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' are not the only guilty parties, but they are just an example of the new trend for Hollywood blockbusters – namely fun family films that are in fact bloated, self-indulgent and need as much of a trim as Russell Brand's hair-do.
These sorts of movies would have skirted close to the 90 minute mark a decade or so ago. Look at the first 'Star Wars' and 'Indiana Jones' movies – they are lean, fast paced and endlessly re-watchable. Now look at the new ones.
But it seems that we're entering an age where directors are kings again. The 80s and 90s was a time of studio power, so films were as close as possible to an hour and half to ensure that they make more profit. A 90 minute film costs the same as a 120 minute film but it gets shown fewer times in a day – meaning less money for everyone.
With the exception of Will Smith, not many of today's movie stars can 'open' a film like they used to. So, cinemagoers are latching onto a director's vision like an established brand. You know what you're getting with a Michael Bay, Steven Spielberg and Tarantino movie. But the more succesful they get, the more they believe they can put anything on the screen and audiences will buy into it.
The problem with directors getting to decide on the final cut of the movie is, who dares tell them they need to reign in their 'talents'? How did anyone attached to the new 'Transformers' film not genuinely ask 'Does this really need to be two and a half hours?' The supporting characters have their own supporting characters!
It’s not just summer action blockbusters, comedies are just as bad. Judd Apatow’s 'Knocked Up' and 'The 40 Year Old Virgin' ran close to two hours.
But with Transformers storming to the top of the box office it looks as if the bladder bursting blockbusters are here to stay. Best bring a cushion.
Are blockbusters too long, or do you think that movie prices are so expensive you want your money's worth?
-More on Y! Movies: Summer blockbusters in July | Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Robert Pattinson has become Britain's biggest star of late with 'Twilight' a huge hit, and 'New Moon' set to be even bigger.
Comment on this article
Please sign in to add your comments.
User comments
No i think its goood it is longer to get the moneys worth and see more of the enjoyable film which you went to see
Posted by: brendandavies on Thu Jul 02 06:07PM | Report abuseNo they are better value. When I was a teenager we got two movies.
Posted by: jcs196003 on Thu Jul 02 06:07PM | Report abusewho really cares?????
Posted by: adsfisher on Thu Jul 02 06:08PM | Report abuse"Now look at the new ones" Average running time of prequel trilogy SW movie - 132 minutes Average running time of original trilogy SW movie - 122 minutes Difference of 10 minutes. Hardly a gigantic, film destroying difference is it? The fact that the prequel trilogy sucked has nothing to do with it's running time. Running time of The Last Crusade - 121 minutes Running time of Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - 122 minutes Wow, and those sixty seconds can be solely attributed to the longer end credits. I'll take your job now please.
Posted by: sean.casey7 on Thu Jul 02 06:10PM | Report abuseYes! there are some films that are far too long. It seems that film makers are so relient on 'special effects' that the actual 'Skill' of using actors effectivly to tell the story/plot/saga got thrown out long ago ( oraound the early 80s) in favour of, bombs/crashes/explosions/often ludcrous special effect gismo's that have no meaning other than 'filling in' for the lack of anything better. When considering a film now, I and many friends, firstly look at the date of production. From 95 is not worth consideration. The real film story quality is simply "Gone"
Posted by: opsigman on Thu Jul 02 06:10PM | Report abuseahh, i could not agree more! spiderman 3 and pirates of the carribean 3 were so long that i never finished watching them-and haven't watched them since the first time. what ever happened to films being a good 90 minutes long? i love movies, but i don't want to spend half my day watching one plot on a film!!
Posted by: hinton410 on Thu Jul 02 06:11PM | Report abuseTransformers, Pirates of the Carribbean 3 and Watchmen stand out for me. Limited scripts that were just dragged out to death. I absolutely love long movies, when they are good. A movie should never feel long. Ive never heard anybody complain about The Godfather being 3 hours long, or Once Upon A Time In America being 4 hours long!
Posted by: tomcroke2003 on Thu Jul 02 06:11PM | Report abuseDas Boot, 3 and a bit hours long but every second a masterpiece
Posted by: mikejonesf355 on Thu Jul 02 06:12PM | Report abuseIt's be ok if there was a break in the middle =) x But that is a little too long x
Posted by: r.foggy on Thu Jul 02 06:12PM | Report abuse"its an occasion, a spectacle, an experience." That is a closer description of Transformers 2 (giant fighting robots, explosions) or At Worlds End (pirates, explosions, ship battles, whirlpool, giant lady, Captain Jack) than it is for Australia (Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman are in love, theres a war, hilarity ensues). So yeah give me your job.
Posted by: sean.casey7 on Thu Jul 02 06:14PM | Report abuse