British cinema-goers are pretty horrified at Todd Phillips’ new movie Joker, and not least because of Joaquin Phoenix's unsettling performance.
After opening in the UK over the weekend, it’s emerged that the movie features Gary Glitter's Rock and Roll Part 2 in a key scene, during which Phoenix's failed comedian Arthur Fleck makes his transformation into his psychotic alter-ego.
The song plays for around two minutes as Phoenix walks down a long flight of stairs.
Glitter, real name Paul Gadd, was convicted in 1999 for downloading thousands of images of child pornography, and was deported from Cambodia in 2002 on suspicion of child sexual abuse. He was jailed in Vietnam in 2006 for molesting two girls, and on his return to the UK was placed on the sex offenders’ register for life.
Then in 2015, Gadd was found guilty of attempted rape, several counts of indecent assault, and another count of having sex with a girl under the age of 13, and was sentenced to 16 years in prison.
Now movie-goers are concerned that the singer will receive royalties for the song's inclusion in the movie. However a music industry expert says that is unlikely to be the case.
“Artists are usually paid a one-off ‘synchronisation fee’ when their songs are used on movie soundtracks,” says Ray Bush, managing director of The Music Royalty Co.
“It can range from £500 for smaller acts up to £250,000-£500,000, depending on the artist and the importance to the narrative of the film. There are many middlemen involved, including the record label, Glitter’s agent and sometimes a ‘synchronisation’ agent, with artists sometimes only receiving a measly amount from the deal.”
Read more: Joker questions answered
He added that Glitter’s current status wouldn’t have given him much leverage to push for a big payday from the deal.
Gadd would receive residual royalties from the film’s success if the song was included in an album release to promote the film, but as of now, the only soundtrack available for the film is an album featuring Hildur Guðnadottir’s orchestral score. The song is likely to receive a listening boost from its inclusion in unofficial fan-curated soundtrack playlists, but streaming services are likely to pay out only a nominal sum.
Many who saw the movie over the weekend have expressed their amazement that the track was cleared for use by producers given Gadd's conviction.
— Rahul Kohli (@RahulKohli13) October 4, 2019
I enjoyed Joker, largely due to some great cinematography and an amazing performance by Joaquin Phoenix. The most surprising/disruptive moment for me, however, was to hear a blast of Rock and Roll, Part 2, by Gary Glitter.
(For anyone unfamiliar with him: https://t.co/xUXWlLOX1G)
— Peter Gasston (@stopsatgreen) October 7, 2019
Surely the main talking point for the new #joker movie should be how Gary Glitter ended up on the soundtrack?!?
— Kevin Bradshaw (@Kev_Bradshaw_82) October 6, 2019
Joker was brilliant. Loved every minute of it. Joaquin is a definite oscar contender after that. Maddest bit was Gary Glitter being on the soundtrack and in an integral scene. Couldn’t get my head around it. People looking at each other like “is this what I think it is?”
— David Farmer (@davesavedlatin) October 6, 2019
Whatever my mixed feelings about Joker, director Todd Phillips using a track by child abuser Gary Glitter over a key scene - in a film that uses child abuse as a plot device no less - is absolute bullshit
— Man vs Pink (@ManVsPink) October 6, 2019
The bungle is the latest in a string of controversies surrounding the movie.
Joker has become the focus of the debate over movie violence in recent weeks after a cinema in Aurora, Colorado, that was the scene of a mass shooting in 2012 said it would not be showing the film.
Parents of the victims of the shooting also signed a letter to Warner Bros calling for more 'social responsibility' in the violence it portrays on screen.
Nonetheless, the movie broke October records on its release over the weekend, making nearly £200m worldwide.